Drawing for NINKATEK

USPTO serial 87098145

NINKATEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEN, LINDSEY HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NINKATEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rory P. Pheiffer

RORY P. PHEIFFER NUTTER MCCLENNEN & FISH LLP155 SEAPORT BOULEVARDSEAPORT WESTBOSTON, MA 02210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for conducting auctions, conducting auctions for the distribution and sale of regulated goods, conducting auctions for the distribution and sale of alcoholic beverages, determining market price for goods being sold, determining market price for regulated goods being sold, determining market price for alcoholic beverages being sold; Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions conducted in the form of an auction via a global computer network and computer database software featuring information in the field of regulated goods; Computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions conducted in the form of an auction via a global computer network and computer database software featuring information in the field of alcoholic beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 19, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 13, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 12, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 10, 2019ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 8, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 8, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 15, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 15, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 10, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 8, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 12, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 11, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 15, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance