USPTO serial 87100043
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 8th Street NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms for transmission of messages among computer users, the foregoing in the field of social networking and on-line dating; providing Internet voice communication services via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Internet based dating and social introduction services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2019 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |