Drawing for SCORE

USPTO serial 87100812

SCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAPLAN, VALERIE ELIZABETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pattric J. Rawlins

Pattric J. Rawlins PROCOPIO CORY HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVEJun 30, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2022CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2022EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 23, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2022COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 29, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 14, 2021EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 3, 2020RBFTREPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES—
Oct 16, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 16, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 8, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 18, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 11, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 21, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 26, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 26, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2016AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Oct 24, 2016IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 24, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 19, 2016AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 19, 2016IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jul 18, 2016EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance