USPTO serial 87101142
MOVING UNPLANNED TO PLANNED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORENO, PAUL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOVING UNPLANNED TO PLANNED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ephraim L. Michael
EPHRAIM L. MICHAEL THE MICHAEL LAW FIRM, LLCSUITE 13010 GLENLAKE PARKWAYATLANTA, GA 30328Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting in the field of information technology; Information technology consulting services; Data mining; Research and development and consultation related thereto in the field of data sciences, machine learning, analytics on structured or unstructured data, statistical modeling, pattern extraction from structured data; Technology consultation and research in the field of data sciences, machine learning, analytics on structured or unstructured data, statistical modeling, pattern extraction from structured data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 17, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2018 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 4, 2017 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 24, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |