Drawing for G-CAT

USPTO serial 87101326

G-CAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with G-CAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Abeloff

AMY ABELOFF SEYFARTH AND SHAW233 South Wacker DriveSuite 8000Chicago, IL 60606-6448

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Natural catastrophe modeling computer software for insurance, reinsurance, and engineering analysis, namely, computer-aided simulation and modeling for creating virtual or three dimensional landscapes, objects, parts, structures and components to assess and determine structural integrity, damage, and cause and effect issues relating to insurance and reinsurance matters involving natural catastrophesACTIVE—
036Reinsurance agency and brokerage services; Insurance services, namely, insurance claims processing; Providing information in insurance, reinsurance, and financial matters; Insurance underwriting services for all types of insurance; Consulting and information concerning insurance; Financial information, investment, and insurance and reinsurance advisory and consultancy services by telephone or other means relating to insurance mattersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 22, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 27, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 27, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 7, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 22, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 16, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 16, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 25, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 25, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 20, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance