USPTO serial 87102949
BEEWARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEEWARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Palm Desert, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod Underhil
ROD UNDERHIL ROD UNDERHILL, ESQ.P.O. BOX 1238JULIAN, CA 92036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Bowls; Carafes; Creamer pitchers; Dishers for serving or portioning honey and edible products made from honey; Dishes; Dishes and plates; Drinking cups; Drinking cups and saucers; Drinking cups sold with lids therefor; Pitchers; Plates; Salad bowls; Serving dishes; Basins; Butter dishes; Candy jars sold empty; Drinking glasses, namely, tumblers; Fruit bowls; Salad bowls; Shallow bowls; Sugar bowls; honey and edible goods made from honey dishes | PARTIALLY PAID | Apr 1, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Oct 24, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |