USPTO serial 87104065
LONG LIVE WELLNESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LONG LIVE WELLNESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria Johnson
MARIA JOHNSON DE NOVO LEGAL, PC1926 KELLOGG AVESTE 101CARLSBAD, CA 92008-5547Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit and vegetable juices, drink and smoothies; Cold press fruit and vegetable juices; Fruit juices; Vegetable juices; Fruit and vegetable based juices; Apple juice beverages; Beauty beverages, namely, fruit juices and energy drinks containing nutritional supplements; Coconut juice; Frozen fruit beverages; Frozen fruit drinks; Fruit beverages; Fruit drinks; Fruit drinks and fruit juices; Fruit drinks and juices; Fruit juice; Fruit juices; Fruit juices and fruit drinks; Grape juice; Grape juice beverages; Herbal juices; Milk of almonds for beverage; Mixed fruit juice; Non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; Non-alcoholic beverages with tea flavor; Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages; Orange juice; Orange juice beverages; Pineapple juice beverages; Smoothies; Tomato juice; Tomato juice beverages; Vegetable drinks; Vegetable juice; Vegetable juices; Vegetable-fruit juices | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | Bakery services, namely, the manufacture of bakery products to order and/or specification of others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2018 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2018 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2018 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2017 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 2, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 12, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |