USPTO serial 87104702
CENTRICVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2019
- Examiner
- DICKEY, ERICA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CENTRICVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura M. Franco
LAURA M. FRANCO WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | downloadable software, namely, mobile applications for monitoring, recording, auditing, testing, analyzing, troubleshooting, measurements and reporting of operational parameters, namely, signal level, signal quality, bandwidth used, data packet loss, temperature, flow, pressure, motion, location and status of communications networks and equipment in the nature of wireless, wired, and satellite communications modems, routers, switches, antennas and sensors in the energy and maritime industries, all of the foregoing excluding equipment relating to photovoltaic solar systems; downloadable software, namely, mobile applications for monitoring, recording, auditing, testing, analyzing, troubleshooting, measurement and reporting of data generated by equipment used in the energy and maritime industries, namely, wireless, wired, and satellite communications modems, routers, switches, antennas and sensors, all of the foregoing excluding equipment relating to photovoltaic solar systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 17, 2012 |
| 042 | providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software platforms for monitoring, recording, auditing, testing, analyzing, troubleshooting, measurement and reporting of operational parameters, namely, signal level, signal quality, bandwidth used, data packet loss, temperature, flow, pressure, motion, location and status of communications networks and equipment used in the energy and maritime industries, all of the foregoing excluding equipment relating to photovoltaic solar systems; platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for monitoring, recording, auditing, testing, analyzing, troubleshooting, measurement and reporting of operational parameters, namely, signal level, signal quality, bandwidth used, data packet loss, temperature, flow, pressure, motion, location and status of communications networks and equipment in the nature of wireless, wired, and satellite communications modems, routers, switches, antennas and sensors in the energy and maritime industries, all of the foregoing excluding equipment relating to photovoltaic solar systems; platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for monitoring, recording, auditing, testing, analyzing, troubleshooting, measurement and reporting of data communications networks and equipment in the energy and maritime industries, namely, wireless, wired, and satellite communications modems, routers, switches, antennas and sensors, all of the foregoing excluding equipment relating to photovoltaic solar systems; consulting services in the field of computer software for monitoring communications networks and equipment, excluding equipment related to photovoltaic solar systems, in the energy and maritime industries; technical support services in the nature of troubleshooting problems with communications network hardware and software, excluding networks related to photovoltaic solar systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 17, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RIGNET, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RIGNET, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RigNet, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by RigNet, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CENTRICVIEW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2025 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2019 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2019 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2018 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2018 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2018 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 5, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 13, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 20, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 23, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |