USPTO serial 87105731
CREATE THE IMPOSSIBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CREATE THE IMPOSSIBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Oshawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine de Lint
CHRISTINE DE LINT NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT CANADA LLPROYAL BANK PLAZA, SOUTH TOWERSUITE 3800, 200 BAY STREETTORONTO, ONTARIO, M5J2Z4Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | 3D printers; 3D bio-printers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |