Drawing for VERSIGRAPH

USPTO serial 87107016

VERSIGRAPH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERSIGRAPH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nancy Sabarra

Nancy Sabarra FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.151 WEST 42nd St., 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable software for use in live production of video, audio, and graphical multi-platform content; downloadable software applications for use in directing video, audio, virtual and augmented reality, and graphical content to multiple platforms such as the internet, media broadcasting outlets, mobile devices, wearable computers, virtual reality headsets, data consoles, electronic billboards, Internet of Things devices, and social media feeds; computer software application development toolsACTIVE—
042Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for live production of video, audio, virtual and augmented reality, and graphical multi-platform content; providing temporary use of online, non-downloadable web applications for use in directing audio, video, virtual and augmented reality, and graphical content to multiple platforms such as the internet, media broadcasting outlets, mobile devices, wearable computers, virtual reality headsets, data consoles, electronic billboards, Internet of Things devices, and social media feedsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 8, 2020CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Dec 10, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 11, 2019AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 9, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 9, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 19, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 19, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 1, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 12, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 8, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Mar 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 13, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 21, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 29, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance