USPTO serial 87108120
LAJA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAJA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
jinhua of zhejiang, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Animal leashes; Dog apparel; Dog bellybands; Dog clothing; Dog coats; Dog collars; Dog collars and leads; Dog leashes; Dog parkas; Dog shoes; Leashes for animals; Pet clothing; Pet hair bows; Pet accessories, namely, specially designed canvas, vinyl or leather bags attached to animal leashes for holding small items such as keys, credit cards, money or disposable bags for disposing of pet waste | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 2016 |
| 020 | Container closures of plastic; Containers for transport, not of metal; Containers, not of metal for commercial use; Containers, not of metal, for liquid fuel; Storage racks; Storage racks for firewood; Industrial packaging containers of bamboo; Industrial packaging containers of wood; Metal storage cabinets; Non-metal valves for containers; Non-metallic closures for containers; Packaging containers of plastic; Packing containers of plastic material; Plastic storage drums; Plastic storage tanks; Shelves for storage; Wood storage tanks | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 2016 |
| 021 | Containers for household or kitchen use; Kitchen containers; Kitchen grinders, non-electric; Kitchen ladles; Kitchen mitts; Kitchen urns; Kitchen utensil crocks; Kitchen utensil, namely, non-metal flexible lid designed for draining or pressing liquids from a food can; Kitchen utensils, namely, pouring and straining spouts; Kitchen utensils, namely, splatter screens; Abrasive pads for kitchen or domestic purposes; Abrasive pads for kitchen purposes; Basting spoons; Bread-cases; Chopping boards for kitchen use; Containers for household or kitchen use; Containers for household or kitchen use not of precious metal; Containers for household or kitchen use of precious metal; Crushers for kitchen use, non-electric; Cutting boards for the kitchen; Dishers; Dryer balls sold empty used to disperse disinfectants to articles in a dryer; Dryer balls that are placed in the clothes drying machine with the clothing to assist in the drying process; Graters for kitchen use; Household utensils, namely, kitchen tongs; Kitchen containers; Ladles, for kitchen use; Non-electric kitchen containers not made of precious metal; Non-electric crushers for kitchen use; Plastic bag holders for household use; Portable plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goods; Rotating holders for kitchen utensils; Serving scoops; Valet trays; Wood chopping boards for kitchen use | ACTIVE | Jul 18, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |