Drawing for LEAN MEAN GREEN

USPTO serial 87108781

LEAN MEAN GREEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEAN MEAN GREEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Charles Coons, Esq.

J. Charles Coons, Esq. Cooper Coons, Ltd.10655 Park Run Drive, STE 130LAS VEGAS, NV 89144UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029cooked and prepared meat; cured meat; smoked meat; processed meat; preserved meat; sausage; sausage links; salted, flavored, spiced, and fermented meat; dried meat; frozen meat; meat-based snack foods; meat extracts; packaged meat; and jerky made from meat, all for human consumption and all produced using natural ingredientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2020MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2020ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2020FIXDELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE—
Jan 3, 2020ERRRON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED—
Dec 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 6, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 4, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 31, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 4, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 11, 2018ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 10, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2018CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2018EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 19, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 28, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 28, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 16, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 16, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 22, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance