USPTO serial 87109144
SHAW ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHINN, LAUREN DONGMI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHAW ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
John J. O'Malley VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 South 17th StreetSuite 1800Philadelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Training software; training guides in electronic format; training manuals in electronic format; training manuals in the form of a computer program; virtual classroom software; none of the foregoing for the flooring or carpeting industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Provision of online training; distance learning services provided online; providing information relating to continuing education via the Internet; providing of information relating to continuing education via the Internet; provision of online tutorials; providing online electronic publications, not downloadable; providing information about online education; providing online electronic publications; providing on-line information and news in the field of employment training; provision of non-downloadable films and television programs via a video-on-demand service; providing non-downloadable electronic publications from a global computer network or the Internet; providing electronic publications from a global computer network or the Internet, not downloadable; providing publications from a global computer network or the internet which may be browsed; electronic publication of texts and printed matter, other than publicity texts, on the Internet; electronic library services; electronic publishing services; electronic publication services; information relating to education, provided on-line from a computer database or the internet; provision of education on-line from a computer database or via the internet or extranets; educational information provided on-line from a computer database or the internet; publication of material which can be accessed from databases or from the internet; educational information provided on-line from a computer database or the internet; information relating to education, provided on-line from a computer database or the internet; educational and teaching services; distance learning services; distance learning courses; correspondence courses, distance learning; organisation of courses using distance learning methods; teaching; teaching services; arranging teaching programmes; education, teaching and training; teaching by correspondence courses; computerised training; computer training services; computer based training; computer assisted teaching services; commercial training services; courses (Training -) relating to banking; training in the field of advertising; training services relating to retail marketing; education services relating to photography; training related to nutrition; education services relating to nutrition; training in electronics; provision of computer related training courses; training services relating to computer systems; training services relating to computer programs; training services relating to computer software; career and vocational training; computerised training in career counselling; teaching of beauty skills; educational services relating to beauty therapy; musical education services; musical instruction services; education services relating to music; providing courses of training for young people; providing courses of instruction for young people; conducting of instructional, educational and training courses for young people and adults; education services relating to languages; education services for imparting language teaching methods; educational services for the teaching of languages; provision of courses of instruction in languages; school services for the teaching of languages; training in catering; education services relating to cooking; educational courses relating to finance; provision of instruction courses in finance; training services in the field of project management; training services relating to design; educational courses relating to design; educational services for teaching manual writing; training or education services in the field of life coaching; training services related to business; consultation services relating to business education; conducting of educational courses in business; provision of training services for business; education services relating to business training; education services relating to management; none of the foregoing for the flooring or carpeting industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 8, 2020 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 15, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 31, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 29, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |