Drawing for ROOTED IN GOODNESS

USPTO serial 87110199

ROOTED IN GOODNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 122

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ROOTED IN GOODNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Schacht

MICHAEL R. SCHACHT SCHACHT LAW OFFICE, INC.310 E MAGNOLIA ST, STE 201BELLINGHAM, WA 98225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029snack chips made of vegetables; snack chips made of root vegetablesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 17, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 31, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 29, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 22, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 22, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 10, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance