Drawing for PRIVACY PULSE

USPTO serial 87110906

PRIVACY PULSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIVACY PULSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David P. Fuad

David P. Fuad ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLPIP PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT2050 MAIN STREET, SUITE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614-8255

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for personal information management; computer software to help consumers identify and opt out from public websites and databases to increase privacy and reduce unwanted solicitations; computer software for identity theft and fraud protectionACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SaaS) service featuring software for personal information management, software to help consumers identify and opt out from public websites and databases to increase privacy and reduce unwanted solicitations, and software for identity theft and fraud protection; providing online non-downloadable software that allows people to identify and manage their personal information and privacyACTIVE—
045Personal information management services, namely, fraud and identity theft protection services in the nature of assisting consumers in removing personal information from public and private websites and databases; monitoring the internet, public records, private and public electronic databases to facilitate the detection of and protection against identity theft and fraud; providing information in the field of data theft and identity theft; fraud and identity theft protection services; providing a secure interactive website concerning notifications of potential fraud and potential identity theft; security services, namely, providing a website featuring notification and alert information on potential fraud and potential identity theft also sent via e-mail alerts and notifications; resolution assistance, namely, providing advice and consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; consultation in the field of data theft and identity theft; and tracking, monitoring, and reporting regarding consumer credit reports and changes thereto for purposes of protecting against data theft, identity theft and fraud; monitoring personal financial account activities for fraud protection purposes; security services, namely, providing a website featuring alerts and notification information concerning possible fraud and identity theft for fraud protection purposes; monitoring public reports concerning larger scale consumer data security breaches for fraud protection purposes; security services, namely, providing a website featuring alerts and notifications information concerning possible fraud and identity theft related to larger scale consumer data security breaches for fraud protection purposes; tracking and reporting regarding consumer credit reports and changes thereto, namely, monitoring consumer credit reports and providing alerts of changes thereto for detection and prevention of identity theft and fraud; providing security advice and consultation in the field of credit reports and credit scores for prevention of identity theft and fraudACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 22, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 21, 2020NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 7, 2020ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
May 6, 2020CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 4, 2020APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 9, 2020EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 8, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 19, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 18, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 13, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 4, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 27, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 5, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 29, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 28, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance