USPTO serial 87111924
GVE GOLDEN VOICE ENGLISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GVE GOLDEN VOICE ENGLISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberley Cunningham
KIMBERLEY CUNNINGHAM BENNETT JONES LLP3200 TELUS HOUSE, 10020-100 STREETEDMONTON, AB, T5J0N3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | instructional software for language training; multimedia software for teaching language training; paper stationary; exercise books; pens; pencils; erasers; pencil sharpeners; periodical publications; printed publications and downloadable electronic publications in the field of language instruction; electronic publications, namely, e-learning courses, assessment and learning exercises, e-books, educational games and courses in the field of language instruction; educational books; educational games for children; educational toys; bags, namely, backpacks, book bags and bags adapted for laptops and tablet computers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | language instruction; language training services; educational services in the field of language instruction and development; developing educational manuals; software as a service (SAAS) provider in the field of language instruction; providing a website in the field of language instruction; providing correspondence courses featuring language instruction; book publishing; online electronic publishing of books and periodicals; publishing of electronic publications; providing online educational resources, namely, e-learning courses, assessment and learning exercises, e-books, educational games, courses and webinars in the field of language development; providing online streaming audio and video educational resources, namely, e-learning courses, assessment and learning exercises, e-books, educational games, courses and webinars in the field of language instruction and development; training, namely, training others to be educators in the field of language instruction; operation of a web site that provides online social networking and forums for the purpose of providing language instruction and the discussion of language instruction and development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |