USPTO serial 87112900
INDUSTRIAL UAV INSTITUTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2017
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, MICHELLE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INDUSTRIAL UAV INSTITUTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cottonwood Heights, UT
Cottonwood Heights, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry G. Scholl
BARRY G. SCHOLL RICHARDS BRANDT MILLER NELSON299 S, MAIN STREET15TH FLOORSALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) industry through workshops, seminars, and on-line courses | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 21, 2016 |
| 041 | Educational services for training pilots and operators of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the nature of flight training for professional, business and hobby applications; development of live and recorded workshops, seminars and on-line courses focused on safety, legal compliance, and maintenance in connection with the operation of UAVs; training in the operation of UAV-mounted video, film and thermal cameras; development and distribution of curriculum in connection therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 21, 2016 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 29, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |