Drawing for BAYOU WITH LOVE

USPTO serial 87113256

BAYOU WITH LOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAN, AMY C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BAYOU WITH LOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth A Feinswog

400 CORPORATE POINTESUITE 300CULVER CITY, CA 90230

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025One-piece garments for infants, toddlers and childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 8, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2021NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2021EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 1, 2021DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 1, 2021IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2021INCSITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE—
Aug 10, 2021INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jul 6, 2021INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Jun 22, 2021AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 8, 2021EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 8, 2021DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 8, 2021ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2020EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2020EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 8, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2020EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2020EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2020AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 6, 2020EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 6, 2020EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 8, 2019NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 13, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 5, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 30, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2019ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 16, 2019PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Mar 27, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 14, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 30, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 29, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 23, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 23, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 15, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 15, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 28, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance