USPTO serial 87113876
GATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2017
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 117
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua S. Jarvis, Esq.
Joshua S. Jarvis, Esq. Foley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardSeaport WestBoston, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Camera mounts and supports; Cameras; Closed circuit TV systems for security and surveillance, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, and recorders; Digital video cameras; Electric door bells; Electric door chimes; [ Environmental enclosures, namely, structures specially adapted to hold and protect cameras from outdoor elements and tampering; Fish-eye conversion lenses for cameras; Motion-activated cameras; ] Remote video monitoring system consisting primarily of a camera and video monitor for recording and transmitting images to a remote location; Video cameras; [ Wide-angle lenses for cameras; ] Wireless communication devices for transmitting images taken by a camera; Digital cameras; Infrared cameras; [ Biometric fingerprint door lock, not for use with gates; ] Digital door locks, not for use with gates; Electric door locks, not for use with gates; Electric strikes for remote control of door ingress and egress, not for use with gates; Electronic door alarms, not for use with gates; Electronic door lock assemblies, not for use with gates; Electronic door locks, not for use with gates; Electronically-operated door latches, not for use with gates; Electronically operated high security lock cylinders, not for use with gates; Radio-frequency controlled door locks, not for use with gates; Security products, namely, entry door systems comprising touch pads and security doors, not for use with gates | ACTIVE | Apr 13, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2023 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2017 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2017 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 8, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |