Drawing for L DOGFISH LABS

USPTO serial 87115440

L DOGFISH LABS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DANG, PETER T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L DOGFISH LABS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas W. Kenyon

DOUGLAS W. KENYON HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP421 FAYETTEVILLE STREETONE BANK OF AMERICA PLAZA, SUITE 1400RALEIGH, NC 27601-2997

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Augmented reality software for use in mobile devices for integrating electronic data with real world environments for the purpose of conveying contextual information for industrial, manufacturing, workforce development, or military needs, all of the foregoing exclusively for use in building and repairing complex structures in an industrial or manufacturing environmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 10, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2018NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 28, 2017ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 18, 2017CHPBPOST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 8, 2017APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 1, 2017EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2017ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 31, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 9, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 29, 2016LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Jul 30, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance