USPTO serial 87115571
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Westmount, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Kremer
MARK D. KREMER CONKLE, KREMER, & ENGEL, PLC3130 WILSHIRE BLVD., SUITE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bouillon; Bouillon concentrates; Broth; Broth concentrates; Dried vegetables; Edible oils; Flavoured nuts; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit chips; Fruit jellies; Jams; Low-fat potato chips; Milk of almonds for culinary purposes; Potato chips; Potato crisps; Prepared nuts; Rice milk for use as a milk substitute; Soups; Tomato purée | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Biscuits; Bread; Bread rolls; Breadcrumbs; Burritos; Cakes; Cereal bars; Cereal-based snack food; Chewing gum; Cookies; Corn flakes; Crackers; Dressings for salad; High-protein cereal bars; Ketchup; Mayonnaise; Muesli; Noodle-based prepared meals; Oatmeal; Pasta; Pasta sauce; Pesto sauce; Pizza; Popcorn; Rice-based snack food; Rice cakes; Sauces; Tomato sauce; Waffles; Soy sauce | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 24, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |