Drawing for LOVE ME SWEET L M S

USPTO serial 87115720

LOVE ME SWEET L M S

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, MIAH ROSENBERG
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOVE ME SWEET L M S?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francis John Ciaramella, Esquire

FRANCIS JOHN CIARAMELLA RICK RUZ, PLLC7355 SW 87TH AVE, SUITE 200MIAMI, FL 33173UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Cheesecake; cheese tarts; fruit tarts; cookies; bread; pies; cakes; chocolate; candy; crepes; buns; loaf cakes; toast; muffins with croissant layers; stuffed buns in the nature of Baozi; cream puffs; waffles; moon cake; Japanese fish-shaped cake; red bean cake; macarons; pastries; puddings; sandwiches; hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; hot dogs sandwiches; meat pie; steamed buns stuffed with minced meat; tea; coffee; ice cream; crushed ice; bubble teaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 18, 2018EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 19, 2018GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2018CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 14, 2017GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2017CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 4, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2017EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 1, 2017JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 1, 2017EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 1, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 1, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Jul 29, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance