USPTO serial 87117308
PEPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAQUIN, SAMUEL ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan Grant Morton
246 West BroadwayNew York, NY 10013UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for processing digital music files, for creating digital animation and special effects of images, and for the integration of text, audio, graphics, still images and moving pictures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2019 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 29, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |