USPTO serial 87117410
BOBO BIRD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2017
- Examiner
- CALLERY, TIMOTHY JOHN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with BOBO BIRD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $650
Owner
SHENZHEN ,GUANGDONG, CN
Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
Guangming, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
Guangming, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
Guangming, Shenzhen, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Audio headphones; ] Chains for spectacles and for sunglasses; [ Earphones; Earphones and headphones; ] Eye glasses; Eyeglass cases; Eyeglass cords; Eyeglass frames; Eyeglass lenses; Eyeglasses; Eyewear; Eyewear accessories, namely, straps, neck cords and head straps which restrain eyewear from movement on a wearer; Eyewear pouches; Eyewear, namely, sunglasses, eyeglasses; Headphones; Headsets for use with computers; [ Loud speakers; Loudspeakers; Loudspeakers, headphones, microphones and CD players; Music headphones; Novelty eyeglasses; Ophthalmic lenses; ] Spectacle cases; Spectacle lenses; Spectacle temples; Spectacles; Spectacles, namely, polarizing spectacles, protective spectacles, anti-glare spectacles; Spectacles and sunglasses; Spectacles, frames and cases; Sports eyewear; Sports glasses; [ Stereo headphones; ] Sun glasses; Sunglass chains and cords; Sunglass cords; Sunglass lenses; Sunglasses; Sunglasses and spectacles; Swim goggles; Swimming goggles | ACTIVE | Oct 6, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN 2WIN TECH LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Shenzhen Zhongke Tuoying Technology Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BOBO BIRD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2025 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 3, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 3, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 4, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2016 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |