USPTO serial 87117890
DEW'S PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POLLACK, ALISON FRIEDBERG
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEW'S PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin Hartley
Kevin Hartley Trust Tree Legal, P.C.798 Berry Road #41400Nashville, TN 37204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather; Pet products, namely, pet restraining devices consisting of leashes, collars, harnesses, restraining straps, and leashes with locking devices; Pet collar accessories, namely, bows and charms; Purses; Suitcases; All purpose sport bags; All-purpose athletic bags; Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets and handbags; Beach umbrellas; Clothing for pets; Hiking sticks; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Patio umbrellas; Sport bags; Travelling bags; Walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Baby bodysuits; Baby bottoms; Baby doll pyjamas; Baby tops; Bras; Dresses; Gloves; Hats; Panties, shorts and briefs; Pants; Scarfs; Shoes; Socks; Swim wear for gentlemen and ladies; Underwear; Belts; Bottoms; Halloween costumes; Jackets; Jerseys; Masquerade costumes; Sleep masks; Ties | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of restaurants; Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and operation of retail stores; Restaurant management for others; Assistance in business management and product commercialization, within the framework of a franchise contract; Business management services, namely, purchasing of and selling of companies for others; On-line retail department store services; Retail store services featuring convenience store items and gasoline; Retail department store services | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Day-care centres; Food preparation; Bar services; Fast-food restaurant services; Fast-food restaurants; Hostels; Nurseries and day care centers; Pet day care services; Providing elder care; Restaurants featuring home delivery; Salad bars; Serving food and drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Du,Nala Fuentes
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named DEW'S PLUS
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 8, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |