USPTO serial 87117961
FOOD WITH ROOTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOOD WITH ROOTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry Kramer
BARRY KRAMER LOCKE LORD LLPCHURCH STREET STATION; P.O. BOX 1470NEW YORK, NY 10008-1470UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Vegetarian food products in the nature of plant-based protein meat substitutes, seasoned and unseasoned; vegetarian prepared meals consisting primarily of plant-based protein meat substitutes; frozen soy-based snack foods and frozen vegetable-based snack foods; meat substitutes consisting mainly of soy protein and other vegetable ingredients; vegetable protein food product in the nature of a bacon alternative; tofu; tempeh; frozen prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables with or without vegetable-based meat substitutes; frozen prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetables with rice, pasta or grains with or without vegetable-based meat substitutes; soy-based frankfurters; soy-based sliced ham, chicken, bologna, pepperoni and turkey; chili beans or soy-based meat substitutes; meatball substitutes made from soy or vegetable protein; soy protein with beans, corn or sauce for use as a meat substitute; soy bean burger patties; soy-based bacon substitute; soy protein meat substitute in barbeque sauce; soy-based sausage substitute; meatless jerky consisting of vegetable-based meat substitutes; chicken strips, chicken nuggets, beef strips and meatball substitutes made from soy or vegetable protein | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Vegetarian prepared meals consisting primarily of rice, pasta, grains, and mixtures thereof and also containing vegetables with and without plant-based protein meat substitutes, seasoned and unseasoned; dough-enrobed foods comprising a dough-based wrapper and dough base with fillings and toppings consisting primarily of vegetables and cheese, with and without plant-based protein; snack foods, namely, eggrolls, spring rolls, pizza snacks, tacos, taquitos, samosas and rice balls, also containing soy protein and frozen vegetables; frozen prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables with rice, pasta or grain with or without vegetarian meat substitutes; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta; dough-enrobed vegetable-based meat substitute; pot pies; prepared entrees consisting primarily of pasta | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |