Drawing for BIOFINE

USPTO serial 87118138

BIOFINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BIOFINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

D. Michael Bean

D MICHAEL BEAN97 FREDERICK STKITCHENER ONTARIO, N2H2L5CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Biopesticides, pesticides and biological fungicides for agricultural, horticultural and domestic useABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2019MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 14, 2019ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 14, 2019OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2019OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 6, 2019OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 4, 2019OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2019PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 19, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 11, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2018GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2018CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2018ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 21, 2018PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 9, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 7, 2018XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2018GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2018GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 7, 2018CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 23, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 23, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 5, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 9, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 9, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 9, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 7, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 1, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance