USPTO serial 87118468
+IMPACT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with +IMPACT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach,
CONNIE L. ELLERBACH, FENWICK & WEST LLP801 CALIFORNIA STREETMOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management of private, district and charter schools | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Charitable services, namely, operation of a school; Providing courses of instruction at the pre-school, elementary, middle school and high school levels; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for teachers; Educational services, namely, developing curriculum for others at the pre-school, elementary, middle school and high school levels; Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the pre-school, elementary, middle school and high school levels and distribution of course material in connection therewith; Educational services in the nature of charter schools; Educational services in the nature of managing private, district and charter schools; educational services, namely, providing advice and consultation regarding instructional school design tailored to the individual needs and capabilities of each student, and that provides innovative teaching technologies and teaching methods; Educational services, namely, designing, developing and providing courses, seminars, and curricula tailored to the individual needs and capabilities of each student; Providing educational assessment services; educational services, namely, providing student testing and assessment services; Educational services, namely, providing cognitive assessments and training programs that help identify cognitive strengths and weaknesses of individual students; Educational services, namely, teacher training in the field of teaching methods and innovations, classroom conflict resolution, and in tailoring teaching methods, curricula and instruction to meet the individual needs and capabilities of each student; Education services, namely, providing classes, seminars, workshops, tutoring, and mentoring in the field of pre-school, elementary, middle school and high school reform; Arranging and conducting educational conferences; Educational services, namely, developing, arranging, and conducting educational conferences and programs and providing courses of instruction regarding school and education innovation; Providing a website featuring information, articles, research results and case studies regarding advanced and innovative teaching technologies and teaching methods; Developing methods for training teachers, educators and school administrators regarding innovation in the field of education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tahoe Expedition Academy, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tahoe Expedition Academy, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named +IMPACT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 23, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2018 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |