USPTO serial 87118607
DEW POINT INFINITE WATER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALCIDO, JOHN CHARLES
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEW POINT INFINITE WATER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Vancouver, BC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ramon A. Klitzke II
RAMON A. KLITZKE II KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP121 SW SALMON ST STE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97204-2988UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Air filters, sediment filters, pre-carbon filters, ultra filtration filters, post-carbon filters and ultra violet filters for use with water purification and dispensing units, air conditioners and heaters for residential, commercial and industrial use; water purification and refrigerated and heated water dispensers for residential, commercial and industrial use; water generation and purification units for industrial and commercial use, comprised of heating and cooling systems, water purification and filtration systems and refrigerated and heated water dispensers, for use in the fields of agriculture, mining, marine services, oil rigs, sea platforms, humanitarian and disaster relief | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of industrial and commercial water purification and generation units comprised of heating and cooling systems, water purification and filtration systems and dispensers, for use in the fields of agriculture, mining, marine services, oil rigs, sea platforms, humanitarian and disaster relief | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2018 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 25, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 1, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |