USPTO serial 87119077
FRARAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 100 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRARAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shenzhen, CN
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Anti-theft locks specially adapted to personal electronic devices, namely, laptop and tablet computers; Computer peripheral equipment; Computer operating programs, recorded; Digital photo frames; Electronic collars to train animals; Electronic tags for goods; Electronic indicator panels; Frames for glasses and pince-nez; Locks, electric; Magnetic encoders; Magnetic encoded card readers; Magnetic encoders; Magnetic identifying cards; Magnetically encoded identification bracelets; Pedometers; Protective films adapted for computer screens; Rechargeable batteries; Smartwatches; Time recording apparatus; Wearable activity trackers; Wearable computer peripherals; Biometric fingerprint door lock; Electric door bells; Electronic card readers; Electronic key cards; Electronic lock assemblies; Electronically operated high security lock cylinders; Encoding and decoding apparatus and instruments; Flip covers for smart phones; Fridge magnets; Magnetically encoded identification bracelets; Reconfigurable processors for use in wireless communication handsets and network equipment in the field of wideband communications; Safety bracelets with warning whistles attached; Safety bracelets with warning whistles attached; Smart card readers; Software for the operational management of portable magnetic and electronic cards | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
| 028 | Christmas tree ornaments with a music feature; Christmas tree ornaments, namely, bells; Christmas tree skirts; Christmas tree stand covers; Christmas tree stands; Electronic action toys; Fishing tackle; Flying discs; Gaming equipment, namely, playing cards, chips, gaming tables and gaming cloths; Mah-jong; Model cars; Toy figures; Toy pistols; Hangers for Christmas tree ornaments; Remote control toys, namely, airplane; Remote control toys, namely, cars; Remote control toys, namely, boats; Toy building blocks capable of interconnection; Toy whistles | PARTIALLY PAID | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2018 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 16, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 20, 2017 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2017 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| May 24, 2017 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 11, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |