Drawing for STRESS DEFENSE

USPTO serial 87119778

STRESS DEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STRESS DEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony J. Biller

Anthony J. Biller Envisage Law2601 Oberlin RoadRaleigh, NC 27608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; Non-medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 13, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Nov 13, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 12, 2021MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2021ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 12, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 23, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Dec 11, 2020MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED
Dec 8, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 8, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2020RGIAREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED
Nov 12, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED
May 21, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 21, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Jun 26, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 15, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 15, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
May 15, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 15, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 15, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Nov 10, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Nov 10, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Nov 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance