Drawing for EMINENCE ROUGE

USPTO serial 87120132

EMINENCE ROUGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EMINENCE ROUGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne Hiaring Hocking

Anne Hiaring Hocking DONAHUE FITZGERALD LLP80 EAST SIR FRANCIS DRAKE BLVD STE 2MSuite 3ELARKSPUR, CA 94939

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines; the foregoing to exclude all port wines and all sparkling winesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 24, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 24, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 13, 2020EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 27, 2019GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2019GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2019CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 18, 2019ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2019EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 18, 2019JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2019EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 17, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
May 17, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 17, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 3, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 2, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 1, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2018DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2018TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 25, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 13, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance