Drawing for NAVORA

USPTO serial 87120187

NAVORA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAVORA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Randall Riccardo

R. RANDALL RICCARDO MOREA SCHWARTZ BRADHAM FRIEDMAN AND BROWN LLP444 MADISON AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Massage oils, essential oils, perfumes, scented room sprays; body care products, namely, skin lotions, body lotions, bathing lotions, hand lotions, facial washes, lip balm, skin toners, hair gels, hair sprays, shower gels, foot scrub, body scrub and body oilACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 28, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 30, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 16, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance