Drawing for GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY

USPTO serial 87120205

GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffery M. Wilday

JEFFERY M WILDAY BROWN HAY & STEPHENS LLP205 SOUTH 5TH STREET SUITE 700PO BOX 2459SPRINGFIELD, IL 62705-2459

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction at the university levelACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2018MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jun 12, 2018ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 12, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 12, 2018EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
May 25, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 25, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 25, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 8, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 8, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 8, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 9, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 9, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 9, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 11, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 21, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance