Drawing for NAVRISK VISION

USPTO serial 87120656

NAVRISK VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHIANG, TIFFANY YOUNG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAVRISK VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erin Morgan Klug

ERIN MORGAN KLUG VARNUM RIDDERING SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP39500 HIGH POINTE BLVDSUITE 350NOVI, MI 48375

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software platforms for policy management, insurance claims management and loss controlACTIVEMar 1, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 10, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 10, 2018EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jun 28, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jun 28, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2018ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 6, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 6, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 6, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 7, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 7, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 7, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 7, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 16, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 3, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance