USPTO serial 87120774
PEACEFUL PIRANHA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEACEFUL PIRANHA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Des Moines, IA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy J. Zarley
TIMOTHY J ZARLEY ZARLEY LAW FIRM PLC400 LOCUST STREETCAPITAL SQUARESUITE 200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2350Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Potato chips; processed nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts and also including seeds, dried fruit, chocolate, raisins, popcorn, pretzels, crackers, granola and corn-based cereals and chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Processed popcorn; corn-based chips; snack mix consisting primarily of pretzels, popcorn, crackers and granola, and also including corn-based cereals and chips, dried fruit, processed nuts, seeds, raisins and chocolate | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 18, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 14, 2017 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2017 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2017 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |