USPTO serial 87121015
WOODLOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HWANG, JOHN C B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOODLOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Grierson
KEVIN GRIERSON CULHANE MEADOWS PLLC2736 HOLLY RIDGE LANESUITE 201WILLIAMSBURG, VA 23185-8358Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Furniture, namely, primarily metal furniture, commercial seating and tables, restaurant furniture, chairs, barstools, stack chairs, and banqueting chairs | ACTIVE | Sep 14, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2018 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2018 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 15, 2017 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 15, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |