USPTO serial 87122080
VIOONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEWKIRK, MERIDITH E.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIOONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Research Triangle Park, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Ergenzinger
EDWARD R ERGENZINGER FISHERBROYLES LLP1107 DALELAND DRIVERALEIGH, NC 27612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laboratory kits comprised of laboratory equipment, namely, sample collection units in the nature of sample collection swab and a vial to hold the swab; sample collection tubes, sample collection tube caps, and package insert and instruction sheets, for collection, storage, transport, and processing of oral fluid samples and other specimen types for non-medical purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2014 |
| 010 | Medical devices for collection, storage, transport, and processing of oral fluid samples; medical specimen kits comprising medical sample collection units in the nature of a sample collection swab and a vial to hold the swab, sample collection tubes, sample collection tube caps, and package insert and instruction sheets, for collection, storage, transport, and processing of oral fluid samples and other specimen types for medical purposes | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2019 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2019 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2018 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2018 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2018 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 26, 2018 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2018 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |