Drawing for REDACTED

USPTO serial 87122608

REDACTED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REDACTED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SABRINA J. DANIELSON

SABRINA J. DANIELSON PERKINS COIE LLPPO BOX 2608SEATTLE, WA 98111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and hardware for performing security, threat, and risk-management assessments, analyses, and investigations; computer software, namely, software for management of security breach incidents and responses; computer software, namely, software for the protection of digital assets from cyber warfare, computer hacking, and computer viruses; computer software, namely, software to monitor and collect systems and network data; computer hardware, namely, hardware to monitor and collect systems and network dataACTIVEApr 3, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2021MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2021ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 13, 2021EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 2021EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 17, 2021GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 17, 2021GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
May 17, 2021CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Apr 13, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 13, 2021JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 13, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 12, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 19, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 19, 2020CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 18, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2020CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2020SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2020IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 4, 2020EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 27, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2019EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 24, 2019EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 24, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 2, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2019EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 29, 2019EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 29, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2018EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2018EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 3, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 28, 2017NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2017DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 23, 2017AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 12, 2017DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2017ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2017EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2017EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 3, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 7, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 29, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 4, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance