Drawing for COLOUR SYNTHESIS SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 87123854

COLOUR SYNTHESIS SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAINTER, VALERIYA SHERMAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOUR SYNTHESIS SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Paskar

MARK A. PASKAR BRYAN CAVE LLP211 N. BROADWAYSUITE 3600ST. LOUIS, MO 63102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for use in further manufacturing and processing, namely, dye intermediaries; dye intermediaries for solar panel and liquid crystal applicationsACTIVE—
002Dyes for use in the manufacture of solar panels, applications incorporating liquid crystals and other dichroic color uses, agricultural products, specialty coatings and paints, detergents, soaps, cleaning compounds, inks, leather, paper, plastics, textiles, wood stains, waxes, oil, lubricants and other related petroleum compounds; dichroic dyes; pigments and other colorants for commercial useACTIVE—
040Custom dye synthesis in the nature of custom manufacture of dyesACTIVE—
042Working on chemical syntheses relating to the development of custom dyes; design and development of dyes for others; testing of textiles and fabrics for others; scientific research and analysis services, and development of chemical syntheses processes, all relating to dyes, colorants and other chemicalsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 9, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 9, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 10, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 10, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 15, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 26, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 14, 2017PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 29, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 5, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance