USPTO serial 87124272
BRISTOL BAY INDUSTRIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5398257Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2018
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRISTOL BAY INDUSTRIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheila Fox Morrison
Sheila Fox Morrison Davis Wright Tremaine LLP1300 SW Fifth AvenueSuite 2400Portland, OR 97201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technology inspection in the field of concrete and pavement; Regulatory compliance consulting in the field of developing fitness-for-service evaluations for the gas and oil industries; Technology inspection in the field of corrosion detection and prevention in the oil and gas fields; Technology inspection in the electrical field, namely, inspecting electrical wiring, fixtures, installations and equipment and their conformity with norms, laws, codes, practice and standards; Engineering; Environmental testing and inspection services; Quality evaluation for others in the field of maintenance, repair and installation of gas and oil installations to assure compliance with industry standards; Technology inspections in the field of structural engineering; Technology inspections in the field of coatings to ensure compliance with professional standards; Technology inspection of machinery and devices used on oil and gas fields; Material testing, namely, metallurgical analysis and testing; Nondestructive, infrared thermography examination services in the nature of technical, mechanical, and inspection services, namely, technology inspection in the field of the petroleum, petrochemical and power industries; Nondestructive testing (NDT) services, namely technology inspection in the field of oil and gas; Inspection services, namely, oil pipeline data analysis for oil pipeline pressure testing and leak detection; Oil spill contingency planning services, namely, consulting services in the field of environmental assessment and planning regarding oil spills; Technology inspection in the field of oil tanks; Technology inspection in the field of pipeline corrosion; Technology inspection in the field of pipelines; Technology inspection in the field of pressure vessels; Providing quality assurance services in the gas and oil industry; Providing technology information relating to the oil and gas industry; Quality audits in the nature of quality assurance services in the field of the oil and gas industry; Research in the field of natural resources; Research, development, consultation, design and engineering services for others in the field of corrosion mitigation; Risk-based integrity program management, namely, technology inspection in the field of oil and gas; Technology advice and consulting service in the area of corrosion inspection of oil and gas production equipment; Environmental testing and inspection services, namely, asbestos inspection; Technology inspection of cranes; Development of new technology for others in the field of rope access; Welding inspection services in the form of testing services in the fields of material joining by welding of others to determine conformity with certification standards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 25, 2017 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bristol Bay Native Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by BRISTOL BAY INDUSTRIAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Bristol Bay Native Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BRISTOL BAY INDUSTRIAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2024 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2018 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 3, 2018 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2017 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2017 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |