USPTO serial 87127235
OPSFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPSFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments through cloud computing; Software development and product development consulting in the field of Configuration Management, Continuous Delivery, Continuos Integration, Continuous Automation, Centralized Log Management Software, Monitoring, System Metrics; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for designing, architecting, monitoring, managing, and optimizing cloud-computing services.; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2017 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 14, 2017 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2017 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 7, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |