Drawing for TOMAHAWK

USPTO serial 87127641

TOMAHAWK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEWKIRK, MERIDITH E.
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOMAHAWK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne Aikman-Scalese

ANNE AIKMAN-SCALESE Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie, LLPOne S. Church Ave.Ste. 700Tucson, AZ 85701

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Design, engineering, research, development of, and testing of air defense missile systems and their components; technical consulting in the nature of design and development of missile systems and their components in the field of air defense missile systems; technical consultation services for others, namely, the technical analysis and evaluation of the engineering of missiles in the field of post flight operations, operational flight support, and flight failure, all of the preceding in relation to missiles; technical consultation services for others, namely, the technical analysis and evaluation of performance of missiles, for the purpose of quality control, in the field of post flight operations, operational flight support, and flight failure, all of the preceding in relation to missiles; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing problems with missile guidance testing equipment; repair and maintenance of simulation software and data recorded on software; repair and upgrade services for missile software; preparation of engineering reports for others comprised of missile technical and administrative data and documentationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2018MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 9, 2018ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Aug 3, 2018EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2018ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2018NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2018PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2018NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2018CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 28, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 14, 2017ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 14, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2016GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 19, 2016GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 19, 2016CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 10, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance