Drawing for CALOCUT

USPTO serial 87127944

CALOCUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALOCUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Nakasone

STEVEN M. NAKASONE BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD.LOS ANGELES, CA 90017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed yam for use as a rice substituteACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 18, 2019MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 18, 2019ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2019EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Apr 15, 2019EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 15, 2019EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Apr 15, 2019EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Sep 20, 2018EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Sep 20, 2018EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Sep 20, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 19, 2018EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDโ€”
Apr 17, 2018EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Apr 17, 2018EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Apr 17, 2018EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 22, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Aug 22, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILEDโ€”
Jul 20, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jul 13, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Jun 6, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
May 31, 2017ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWNโ€”
May 30, 2017PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERYโ€”
May 8, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
May 8, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDโ€”
May 8, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
May 8, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDโ€”
May 8, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENโ€”
Nov 15, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Aug 9, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDโ€”
Aug 8, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance