USPTO serial 87130670
NOURISH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NOURISH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Teresa Lee, Esq.
Teresa Lee, Esq. Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dried fruit-based food snack foods; Dried vegetable-based snack foods; Protein bites, namely, nut clusters; Protein based, nutrient dense snack bites consisting primarily of processed nuts, dehydrated fruits and protein powders; Nut and seed-based food bites; Dried fruit-based food bites; Dried vegetable-based food bites; Soy-based snack foods; Snack mixes consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds and dried fruit; Dried fruit; Dried vegetables; Dried fruit mixes; Processed nuts and edible seeds; Nut-based snack foods; Dried beans; Processed chickpeas; Jerky; Potato chips; Vegetable chips; Nut- and dried fruit- based snack bars; Nut- and seed- based snack bars; Nuts, namely, chopped nuts, seasoned nuts, enrobed nuts, coated nuts, oil roasted nuts, dry roasted nuts; Snack food dips; Legume-based snack foods; Nut butter-based snack foods; Seed-based snack foods; Cheese-based snack foods, namely, cheese and cracker combinations | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Grain-based snack bites containing, namely, vegetables and protein powders; Ready to eat cereal derived food bars; Chocolate-based snack foods; Chocolate; Corn chips; Tortilla chips; Pita chips; Candy; Confections, namely, chocolate confections and caramel confections; Granola-based snack bars; High-protein cereal bars; Cereal, namely, processed cereal and ready-to-eat cereal; Cereal-based snack food; Cookies; Crackers; Puffs, namely, cheese puffs, legume puffs, lentil puffs, grain puffs, corn puffs, quinoa puffs, ancient grain puffs, vegetable puffs and fruit puffs; Popcorn; Pretzels; Chocolate bark; Bakery goods; Corn-based snack foods; Wheat-based snack foods; Pretzel and cheese combinations; Puffed cheese balls; Coconut-based snack foods; Pretzel chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2020 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2020 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 26, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 23, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2017 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 11, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 25, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2017 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 16, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |