Drawing for STAY WOKE

USPTO serial 87130727

STAY WOKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAY WOKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelena Hallie

KAYDI OSOWSKI VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC1515 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services in the nature of continuing program series, featuring live action, comedy and drama provided through cable television, broadcast television, internet, video-on-demand, and through other forms of transmission media; providing online information in the field of entertainment concerning television programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2018MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 3, 2018ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 3, 2018EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 3, 2018EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Mar 28, 2018GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2018CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 26, 2018ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2018EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 2018JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 26, 2018EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 26, 2017GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 26, 2017GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2017CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 27, 2017GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2017GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2017CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 26, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance