USPTO serial 87131208
PIXELED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PIXELED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GRAND CAYMAN KY1-1208, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DRIVE-SUITE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW PRODUCTS; SCIENTIFIC LABORATORY SERVICES; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH; TECHNICAL RESEARCH; TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF INDICATE FIELD OR GOODS THAT ARE SUBJECT OF RESEARCH; TECHNICAL PROJECT STUDIES; TECHNOLOGICAL CONSULTANCY; CONSULTANCY IN THE FIELD OF ENERGY-SAVING?INDUSTRIAL DESIGN; NEW PRODUCT DESIGN SERVICES; SEMICONDUCTOR CHIP DESIGN SERVICES; DESIGN OF MACHINES FOR INTEGRATING MICRO SCALE DEVICES; DESIGN OF TECHNOLOGY FOR INTEGRATING MICRO SCALE DEVICES; DESIGN OF TECHNOLOGY FOR MICRO SCALE DEVICES TRANSFER ONTO NON-NATIVE SUBSTRATES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |