Drawing for SH SUPER HUSTLER

USPTO serial 87131385

SH SUPER HUSTLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SH SUPER HUSTLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory P. Borgognoni

GREGORY P. BORGOGNONI BORGOGNONI LAW, PL2525 PONCE DE LEON BLVDSUITE 300CORAL GABLES, FL 33134

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, athletic uniforms; Business wear, namely, suits, jackets, trousers, blazers, blouses, shirts, skirts, dresses and footwear; Footwear; Hats; Athletic footwear; Baseball caps and hats; Beach footwear; Belts; Eyeshades; Hoods; Jackets; Jerseys; Sports caps and hats; Ties; Tops; WristbandsACTIVEApr 20, 2016

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2017MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 7, 2017ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 4, 2017EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2017ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 4, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 4, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2016LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Aug 12, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 11, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance