Drawing for CARDIONET MCOT PATCH

USPTO serial 87132432

CARDIONET MCOT PATCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIGLE, KATHERINE CONNOLLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARDIONET MCOT PATCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bethany A. Stokes

BETHANY A. STOKES GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLPONE INTERNATIONAL PLACEBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices, namely, portable electronic patient monitors and patient sensors with automated alert and monitoring capacity for monitoring and measuring patient reported symptoms, heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, pain, the oxygen saturation of the blood and other vital sign and diagnostic parametersACTIVE—
044Medical diagnostic monitoring and reporting services for medical professionals and medical patients provided via telecommunication networks and/or global computer networks featuring medical information in the nature of patient reported symptoms, heart rate, blood pressure, body temperature, pain, oxygen saturation of the blood and other vital sign and diagnostic parameters, gathered from electronic patient medical monitoring devices which feed information to remote locations that can be accessed in real-time by medical professionals for purposes of monitoring and diagnosing medical conditions for individuals with health problemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 9, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 11, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 26, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2017TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2016MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2016NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2016NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance