USPTO serial 87132540
NUERA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUERA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen B. Goldman
Stephen B. Goldman Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP600 SOUTH AVENUE WESTWESTFIELD, NJ 07090UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Hotel management for others; Administrative hotel management; Association services, namely, promoting diversity in the restaurant and hotel industries on behalf of employees, vendors, management, and owners; Business management of hotels; Business management of hotels for others; Providing price comparison services in the field of Hotels via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Real estate hotel development and construction of hotel property | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing room service delivery services to hotels and condominiums | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Hotel accommodation services; Hotel and motel services; Hotel and restaurant services; Hotel services; Hotel services for preferred customers; Hotel, bar and restaurant services; Hotel, motel, restaurant, bar and catering services; Hotels; Agency services for booking hotel accommodation; Hotel, restaurant and bar services; Hotel, restaurant and catering services; Hotels; Making hotel reservations for others; Making reservations and bookings for others for accommodations and meals at Hotels; Providing hotel accommodation; Providing a website featuring information in the field of hotels and temporary accommodations for travelers; Providing extended-stay hotels; Providing information and advice on hotels and restaurants to tourists and business travelers; Providing on-line reviews of restaurants and hotels; Providing personalized information about hotels and temporary accommodations for travel via the Internet; Providing temporary accommodation at Hotels; Providing temporary accommodation at pensions; Providing temporary lodging services in the nature of a condominium hotel; Providing travel lodging information services and travel lodging booking agency services for travelers; Reservation of hotel rooms for travelers; Reservation of hotel rooms for travellers; Residential hotel services; Resort hotel services; Restaurant and hotel services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Hotel concierge services; Personal concierge services for others comprising making requested personal arrangements and reservations, running errands and providing customer specific information to meet individual needs, all rendered in business establishments, office buildings, hotels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Core Development Holdings Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Core Development Holdings Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named NUERA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 22, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2018 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 20, 2018 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2018 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2018 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 27, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 16, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2017 | CHPN | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT – NOT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2017 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2016 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2016 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |